Navigating Generative AI Risk: What Tech Leaders Should Do Today and Prepare for Tomorrow

2025.11.22 5 min

Generative AI is reshaping industries at remarkable speed, but the risks surrounding it are evolving just as quickly. For technology leaders, the challenge is twofold: deploying practical solutions today while building resilience for the more complex risks emerging tomorrow.

Here are the major categories of generative AI risk—and the approaches organizations are beginning to adopt to manage them.

1. Enterprise Risks Are Growing Across Data, Applications, and Processes

Data privacy, security, and intellectual property

Gen AI models often rely on enormous datasets collected from varied and sometimes unverifiable sources. This makes it hard to track data provenance, raising questions about copyright ownership, creator intent, and the legitimacy of the material used in training. There is also the risk of unintentionally ingesting or exposing sensitive information. For example, natural-language interfaces used to query internal records—such as customer or patient data—can expand the surface area for privacy incidents if not tightly governed.

Security concerns in development workflows

AI-generated code can unknowingly embed misconfigurations or replicate existing vulnerabilities. Many security leaders now rank AI-generated code among their top concerns, especially given the limited visibility into third-party foundation models.

At the same time, employees increasingly experiment with public gen AI tools through personal accounts. This "shadow AI" behavior can lead to unintentional data leakage, as shown by past high-profile incidents in which staff unintentionally exposed confidential information in public prompts.

2. Emerging Risks Target the Models Themselves

Gen AI introduces attack vectors that traditional software simply didn’t face.

Prompt injection - malicious actors can craft prompts that override safety features, extract sensitive information, or trigger unauthorized actions. Prompt injection now ranks among the most significant threats to large-language-model applications.

Evasion attacks - by probing a model with carefully designed inputs, attackers can cause it to misclassify data or bypass decision logic, potentially compromising security systems or other automated processes.

Data poisoning - if training data is deliberately manipulated - or unknowingly sourced from compromised repositories - models can be skewed toward incorrect or harmful outputs. This risk is amplified in systems that combine external data with retrieval-augmented generation pipelines.

Hallucinations and misinformation - gen AI can produce outputs that sound authoritative but are completely inaccurate. These hallucinations can mislead decision-makers, erode trust, and expose organizations to regulatory or reputational fallout.

3. New Security Approaches Are Taking Shape

Tech leaders are adopting emerging practices to strengthen their generative AI defenses.

Protecting against prompt manipulation

Input validation and sanitization to filter or neutralize harmful instructions
Least-privilege access controls to limit how much a model can access or act upon
AI firewalls and monitoring gateways that evaluate both inputs and outputs
Human-in-the-loop review for sensitive or high-impact decisions
Improving accuracy and reducing hallucinations

Fine-tuning models with domain-specific data, incorporating authoritative external sources through retrieval-augmented generation, adding contextual guardrails, and maintaining robust prompt libraries are all proving effective in reducing hallucination rates.

Enhancing cybersecurity with AI

Organizations are increasingly incorporating AI-driven capabilities into their security operations:

Gen AI can identify subtle anomalies in system logs or network traffic.
AI-powered phishing detection models can identify sophisticated attacks more accurately than traditional tools.
Deepfake-detection algorithms help identify machine-generated text, audio, and imagery.
Adversarial training and GAN-based vulnerability discovery can reveal weaknesses that standard scanners miss.

4. Priorities for the Future

Future-ready organizations are approaching gen AI risk not as a barrier but as a design principle for sustainable adoption.

Three priorities stand out:

Strengthen architectures and controls to address new model-level and data-level attack surfaces.
Develop clear governance, including sanctioned tools, safe-use guidelines, and continuous monitoring.
Treat gen AI as a dynamic system, requiring ongoing validation, retraining, and oversight.

The organizations that succeed in the next era of AI will be those that embrace innovation—but balance it with vigilance, adaptability, and a clear strategy for managing the risks that come with powerful new capabilities.

Sources: